It can give the appearance of being a more satisfying and effective answer.
Thus, does it become such that those seemingly most specific and fitting responses are no longer needed?
It seems the thought itself would imply actions that appear to be more fitting—the clear cognition or understanding of the problem.
The way of dealing with matters that appears to be the most effective should embody something worthwhile in understanding or coping.
That ultimate approach, which seems more satisfactory, is a fitting way to handle or respond to the problem.
Thus, does it also eliminate the need for an unacceptable understanding or analysis of the problem?
Similarly, one can give what seems like a more satisfactory and fitting response—whether human or ideal—to the problem.
It's as if the remaining judgments no longer require further acknowledgment of unacceptable considerations related to the problem.
